body

Words like Blades

~ Frank Hudson ~ Leave a comment

This Emily Dickinson poem tracks like many others of hers: a vivid set of images, so unexpected in its choices and details finished with a gnomic conclusion that puzzles as well as tantalizes. Last time we had her famous “My Life had stood — a Loaded Gun.”   Today’s lesser-known poem is just as weaponized. I find it as strong as “Loaded Gun” — Dickinson, powerful enough as a writer to bring the proverbial knife to a gun fight. Here’s a link to the poem “She dealt her pretty words like Blades”  in case you’d like to follow along.

I maintained last time that in “Loaded Gun”  Dickinson created a tragic character out of an inanimate object. Today she’s describing some other personage who uses “words like blades.” I didn’t think she was the gun in the last poem, only its playwright. Is the blade-wielder here Dickinson? I can’t say for sure. Is she “othering” herself to examine something she does with her verse? Poets will do this, but at first I was unconvinced. Dickinson has elements of satire and calling out foolishness in her poetry, sure, but I’ve never seen her as the kind of devastating wit that boldly impales the subjects and pins them to the bloody page. Did she think she could do that, or that some thin-skinned reader thought she did that? Possible, but we must consider the theory is that she may be writing of another writer.

Who? I don’t know. Our knife-wielder is gendered female, and in Dickinson’s 19th century circle that doesn’t leave us with many candidates. The woman-poets we know she read: Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Emily Brontë, or her classmate Helen Hunt Jackson don’t immediately jump out, saber in hand. Of the three, Brontë with her Gondal fantasy world poems is the strongest “could be” here. If we stretch it, I could add to the suspect line-up the “terrible swift sword” Julia Ward Howe of “Battle Hymn of the Republic”  fame. These are all wild guesses, so let’s leave that off, posit it doesn’t really matter to the poem, and return to read it again.

Rereading the poem, I began to sense less of a swashbuckler and more of a butcher’s tale here. Aha! Now we see something that I can associate with Dickinson’s life. In the household domestic tasks the two Dickinson daughters had to carry out, Emily took to the cooking and the gardening from all accounts. Did she butcher meat, or prepare cooking cuts from carcasses? The wantoned, without concern for the former life of the meat, carving to the bone is in that work. She does say the blade is being used on “Creatures” in her images too. If we want to return and take this poem’s “she” as Emily Dickinson, then here we may have the dissecting poet* we read in her work metaphorically describing something of her process!

Let me help with the swan cooking! by Kim Simonsson

This striking image shows an installation by artist Kim Simonsson at the American Swedish Institute some years ago.

.

I can’t give you a clear reading of the poems final four lines either, I only see the images, not where they are to lead us. Pain, human pain, is indeed not polite. The film upon the eye is the dead eye on the carcass. What though is the locking up in the last line? That we abstract (lock out) ourselves from the former living creature now the meat? Did she butcher for cold storage in a meat locker? These biographic details — again, perhaps beside the point. In experiencing the poem, those things are dispensable. Is this a household butcher or a fearless ninja-writer? She wants the effect of both for the listener, and perhaps Dickinson is happy that the final part’s summary is just as mysterious as a blade-wielder leaping out from her packet of poems.

I’m always amenable to mystery in the music I present here. Here I used my 12-string acoustic guitar and a viola with the undercurrent of the South Asian tanpura beneath them. What’s the tanpura doing there with these occidental instruments? Oh, it just mysteriously appeared, drawn to the drone of the lowest strings on the guitar You can hear my performance of “She dealt her pretty words like Blades”  with the audio player gadget below. No player to be seen? Maybe one will appear like that tanpura within a new tab called up by this highlighted link.

.

*It quite possible that she dissected animals as part of her schooling. Another biographic theory.

I felt my life with both my hands

~ Frank Hudson ~ 2 Comments

The occasion for today’s post and audio piece is Emily Dickinson’s birthday, but I chose this poem of hers to set to music for other reasons. It’s been quite the year since spring for my little family, and this past month has had some additional things to deal with. I keep meaning to find a way to write about those things, but despite the large presence of I-own-my-part-of-the-story writing on the Internet and elsewhere, I can’t feel comfortable writing for the public about personal journeys of others I love and are close to me.

I’ve read through various collections of Emily Dickinson’s poetry over the years, and I even attended online a reading this past September of all 1,789 of her poems from one ascribed complete edition. Here’s one thing I notice about reading or listening to Dickinson: while I’m always ready to wave my hands in the air for her greatest hits, each time you dive into that alternate hymnal of hers some poem will seem new to you, will grab you with a fresh surprising turn of phrase or thought.

And so, it was a few weeks ago when someone shared today’s poem on the Internet. I wished I’d taken notes, as I have that person to thank. Even before I finished reading “I felt my life with both my hands”   I said to myself “Is Dickinson talking about what I think she’s talking about — and if she isn’t, has she written a poem that accidentally speaks to certain things we think of as modern concerns?” I think the question comes around to if this is a spiritual poem about immortal souls, or if it’s a body image poem — and then, if we must necessarily divide those things, if Dickinson wanted us to. On the outward level this poem speaks of our inner spirit, of consciousness of selfhood, but the metaphors are often physical things one can touch and see, and since Dickinson has shown in other poems that she is comfortable writing in incorporeal abstracts, I can easily believe this imagery is a choice here.*  In short, before I finished that singular reading of this poem this fall, I thought “Dickinson is writing a poem about body dysmorphia, or plausibly gender dysphoria.”

Both of those things weren’t named until after Dickinson’s death, and discussion and understandings about gender dysphoria are still somewhat new in our century, so it’s a leap to say that our mid-19th century poet means to write about those things. So let me go through the poem and try to extract a gloss of what Dickinson wrote.

Both my Hands

I added an “inline epigraph” to the text of Dickinson’s poem. It appears in quotes above.

.

The first stanza refers to an antiquated test for life, holding a mirror up to a subject’s nose and mouth to see if it mists over from respiration — but she’s also portraying by association looking in a mirror. Of course in our day the glass we hold up to our faces is likely the screen of a smartphone with a selfie camera, but the image retains.

I don’t think one needs to insert much into the second stanza to see body dysmorphia. Sure, she could  be reaching for a rhyme for “round” when she uses “pound.” I’m not knowledgeable enough to know what weight ideals were for Dickinson’s time and place, but what’s clear here imagistically is that the poem’s speaker is examining their body and feeling like they are not that body. Is it because they, their self, are philosophically a soul — or because that body doesn’t agree with their soul?

Third stanza. More body examination. “Jarred my hair” is a particular image. Is this some kind of pomade or other cosmetic? I think Dickinson has chosen jarred to pun on “jarring” here. The dimples image would again speak perhaps of weight concerns/dysmorphia.

The last four lines, Dickinson’s final stanza, indicates again the spirit or soul as essential self. Having left off with knowledge that the self/spirit and the body are not the same, the new place, the new home, the poem’s speaker finds themselves in is Heaven.

Nowadays speculations learned and affinititory about Dickinson’s sexuality have become common, yet I don’t see any first page search hits on her and gender dysphoria. The case for that here in this poem may well be accidental, if none-the-less striking, as the narratives of folks experiencing gender dysphoria might well fit into these poetic lines: the separation of the spirit and the body, the disconnection of the body from the authentic self, the feelings of relief when expressing outwardly their inner conviction. The third stanza’s jarring of hair and pushing in dimples takes another vivid incarnation if viewed in that frame.

Now those with the patience to read this far may still be interested in what I did with this experience of the poem — though if you’re a patient reader who is muttering “Balderdash” as you read the above, you are excused to go do something worthwhile. My impression from my encounter led me to alter Dickinson’s text with a sort of in-line epigraph from the song “Candy Says,”  written by Lou Reed for the opening track on the LP eponymously called The Velvet Underground.* *  The unpredictability and distress of the past couple of weeks has, I fear, given forth a less than ideal performance — but perhaps it’s imperfection has a certain authenticity to the times it was composed and recorded in. You can hear it with the player gadget below (where seen) or with this backup highlighted link.

May you find your joy and help others find theirs too. Production of new pieces and new blog posts here may be erratic, or they may be therapeutic, in unpredictable proportions, but there are the over 650 pieces in our archives here.

.

*Another choice is her use of “both my hands” in the first line. It’s not like the body would slip out of one’s grasp if you didn’t grab it with two hands. I think this is a choice to highlight duality.

**This song from 1969 opens with a clear dysphoria statement: “Candy says, I’ve come to hate my body, and all that it requires in this world.” I’m sure there are clever thinkers among spiritual people who can consolidate the idea of an inner soul which is not the physical body with a disbelief in gender dysphoria.

My Feet

~ Frank Hudson ~ Leave a comment

Today’s piece uses words from a more modern poem from a Minnesota poet: Renée Robbins. I met Renée after this piece was written, but I recall going with her to a very nice soirée celebrating the publication of this collection of poems by Minnesota poets, including her “My Feet”,  40 years ago.

A Coloring Book of Poetry for Adults

A good attempt at a broad-view of 70s Minnesota poets, including Renée.
Oddly, I can’t find the credit for the cover artist. Anyone know?

 

This was the 1970s, and from our age or our ages, an optimistic time to be a poet in Minnesota. Running down a list of names, I’ll slight anyone I leave off out of concerns of length and focus, but locally it was still the age of Robert Bly, John Berryman, and James Wright. Minnesota literature, at that time, seemed to have placed poetry at least equal to the novel or memoir.

I had come recently from New York and had reconnected with Dave Moore who had finished college. I was writing furiously, filled with a Twenty-Something desire to set on the page all the patterns I could see in our still forming lives. Renée had taken a shorter trip, going to college first in Duluth and then in Marshall Minnesota where she studied with Phil Dacey.

There is a longer story here, full, like most life stories, with twists that seem meaningful to us—even if not invested with the same importance by fate—but let’s return to poets, and the 1970s, and Minnesota.

Renee Robbins 1970s

Renée Robbins, later the 1970s

 

Note that truncated list I gave of the exciting characters, the names of poets that would be in someway connected to Minnesota in that time. No women. I find that odd. No similar list of the most notable contemporary poets in the United States made the middle ‘70s would be so gender singular. Is this an accident, a side-effect of the stubborn impact of Robert Bly locally, a reflection of a lingering patriarchy, or just a reflection of my own framing as I look backwards? It could be all of them I suppose. Established names or not, woman’s voices were coming forward.

Renée and I fell in love. Eventually we married. Eventually she got sick and died shortly after the turn of the century. As I said, these twists in the stories we hold as ours seem meaningful to us. Perhaps it’s a meaning like a deep poem, one with a deep image, one that doesn’t stand for anything other than itself, one that can bend light around it, leaving the densest shadow, as life still glitters around it, with a strange margin where they meet.

Robbins’ “My Feet”  may not be that kind of deep poem, but as I tried to argue here recently, poetry is richer and less constrained when we feel we can use it for more than the deepest things. And Robbins’ choices in “My Feet”  implicitly make that argument I think. Ozymandias may have two vast and trunkless legs of stone and those meaningful sands mocking them, but the rest of us have only our tired dogs, like to those Renée can apprehend with her characteristic artistic focus on close looking. Her time on the farming plains of Southwest Minnesota may have given her a new landscape to appreciate those feet.

To hear my music and performance of Renée Robbins’ “My Feet,”  use the player below.